APAC CIOOutlook

Advertise

with us

  • Technologies
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Big Data
      • Blockchain
      • Cloud
      • Digital Transformation
      • Internet of Things
      • Low Code No Code
      • MarTech
      • Mobile Application
      • Security
      • Software Testing
      • Wireless
  • Industries
      • E-Commerce
      • Education
      • Logistics
      • Retail
      • Supply Chain
      • Travel and Hospitality
  • Platforms
      • Microsoft
      • Salesforce
      • SAP
  • Solutions
      • Business Intelligence
      • Cognitive
      • Contact Center
      • CRM
      • Cyber Security
      • Data Center
      • Gamification
      • Procurement
      • Smart City
      • Workflow
  • Home
  • CXO Insights
  • CIO Views
  • Vendors
  • News
  • Conferences
  • Whitepapers
  • Newsletter
  • Awards
Apac
  • Artificial Intelligence

    Big Data

    Blockchain

    Cloud

    Digital Transformation

    Internet of Things

    Low Code No Code

    MarTech

    Mobile Application

    Security

    Software Testing

    Wireless

  • E-Commerce

    Education

    Logistics

    Retail

    Supply Chain

    Travel and Hospitality

  • Microsoft

    Salesforce

    SAP

  • Business Intelligence

    Cognitive

    Contact Center

    CRM

    Cyber Security

    Data Center

    Gamification

    Procurement

    Smart City

    Workflow

Menu
    • Education
    • Cyber Security
    • Hotel Management
    • Workflow
    • E-Commerce
    • Business Intelligence
    • MORE
    #

    Apac CIOOutlook Weekly Brief

    ×

    Be first to read the latest tech news, Industry Leader's Insights, and CIO interviews of medium and large enterprises exclusively from Apac CIOOutlook

    Subscribe

    loading

    THANK YOU FOR SUBSCRIBING

    • Home
    • Education
    Editor's Pick (1 - 4 of 8)
    left
    A Blend of Six Technologies to Enhance Teaching-Learning Processes

    John Hui, CIO, The Education University of Hong Kong

    The Power of Partnering in Educational Technology

    Paul Oppenheimer, CIO, and Sue Bolt, Director Planning & Resources, RMIT University

    Key principles for campus technology investments

    Jeff Murray, CIO, University of Tasmania

    Love IT or List IT: Renovating STEM

    Paige Francis, Associate CIO, University of Arkansas

    Technology Driving Change in Higher Education

    Anthony Molinia, CIO IT Services, University of Newcastle

    The Impact of Technology on Research

    Christine Burns, Chief Information Officer, University Of Technology Sydney

    Discovering the Unique Possibilities in Higher Education

    Anthony Molinia, CIO, IT Services, University of Newcastle

    What is the Next Big Thing?

    Jeff Murray, CIO, University of Tasmania

    right

    Are We at Peak Ed Tech?

    Kate Ames, Director, Flexible Learning and Innovation Projects, CQUniversity

    Tweet
    content-image

    Kate Ames, Director, Flexible Learning and Innovation Projects, CQUniversity

    This is a question that I and my team have been mulling over at length. Every day, it seems, another email comes in trying to attract attention about a new ed tech product. It seems this point has been coming for a while. Anyone who follows education bloggers like Tony Bates, Michael Feldstein, and Stephen Downes, the question of ‘Peak Ed Tech’ has been raised for the best part of a decade.

    As an educator and administrator involved in designing innovative education ‘products’ for university and vocational students, the central questions when considering the implementation of new ed tech tools are ‘why’ and ‘how will this enhance the learning or teaching experience of students and staff’? Aside from the standard aspects such as budget, integration, and implementation, I’m also thinking about adaptation, stability, data, accessibility, need and broader cost of implementation when I’m considering ed tech products.

    Adaptability: Adaptability of a tool needs to be underpinned by the principles of collaboration and consistency, both of which are critical for social and productive learning. Micro-tools, which focus on one aspect of classroom engagement, might be useful, but only represent incremental adaptability. This is where platforms like Microsoft Teams are starting to make genuine headway, because they embed micro-tools to make the broader platform more adaptable. When we look at changing systems, we run the risk of spending big to make significant change, only to see the micro-tools that attracted us implemented in our original platform.

    Stability: I’ve been an early adopter (and adapter) of technology throughout my two decades plus of teaching and developing online curriculum. I still mourn for great products like Wiggio and Storify. While Notion and Wakelet have somewhat filled the void in those particular cases, the disruption when a tool is discontinued or reoriented is substantial for those of us who have embedded those tools into online learning resources. This makes people like me cautious. We want to know about long term plans and sustainability.

    Data: In an environment where there is an increasing interest in AI in education that addresses personalised learning, use of data and associated privacy remains a key concern.

    The race to tech oligopoly is evident now, but at the other end of the spectrum, there remains potential for highly boutique customised solutions, not always online

    This will be of no surprise to anyone reading this. I’ve learned that people get very excited about learning analytics - my question to anyone presenting the benefit of analytic data to me is ‘so what’? If someone suggests personalised learning as a benefit, I question what we do with our offline students, or those moving away from digital learning. I see this as an increasing trend, actually. As a former media practitioner, we’ve seen the social influence of the ‘unseen’ - those we can’t track for voting preference because they avoid digital engagement, as an example. Developing personalised learning support for students based on their digital engagement is awesome, but what about those students (and professionals engaging in workplace learning) who are working offline? My institution has a specific interest in social equity, and digital inequity is at forefront of mind. I’ve yet to hear a pitch for a digital tool that specifically addresses this.

    Accessibility: We tend to hear the term ‘useability’ when assessing ed tech for application in the classroom, but in my view, accessibility is a better term because it implies usability, but goes further, because it also requires consideration at the design phase. For ed tech to be accessible to and for staff and students, there must be limited barriers for use. This goes beyond technology, and needs to consider context - cognitive load, classroom context, study or teaching experience. Accessibility is normally used with reference to disability; as happens with the best design for disability, accessible ed tech should be designed in partnership with those who will use it, not just tested prior to implementation.

    Need and cost: Finally, the question arises as to the need for a new tool. There is a lot of shiny and new tech bling. Some of it is very compelling. When considering adoption of new ed tech, though, we have to weigh it against the cost of implementation that goes beyond initial purchase - what, for example, are the real costs of training, time lost for re-orientation to a new system, and overall benefit of change. Our best implementations have been through partnerships where we are able to co-design technology with vendors, as opposed to trying to retrofit process to, or adapt, vanilla products. It’s our experience that more companies are refining their ability to partner with organisations such as mine, but critical issues such as intellectual property can be problematic. Why are we paying for your product when we helped you design it?

    I raise the question of ‘peak ed tech’ because while some organisations are new to online delivery, others have very sophisticated models of curriculum delivery and are genuinely ‘ed teched out’. For these latter organisations, more complex models are best supported by more simple concepts, and we are more likely to purchase experience or engage in longer-term exploratory relationships than a tool to solve one problem.

    The future campus, at one extreme, might look like a cloud-based Microsoft Teams environment, where all education technology is embedded as a potential app, and all resources are accessed via subscription to a hub such as Amazon. In this version of the future, ed tech companies are pitching to ‘big tech’ and bypass people like me. The race to tech oligopoly is evident now, but at the other end of the spectrum, there remains potential for highly boutique customised solutions, not always online.

    Ed tech vendors are dealing with organisations anywhere between these two extremes. The challenge is to get through the door of those more complex organisations. It is those that are feeling the ‘peak ed tech’ fatigue and looking for more relationship-focused solutions. It’s a challenge worth pursuing because under the right business model, the exploratory relationship will have many benefits for the right team.

    Weekly Brief

    loading
    Top 10 Education Tech Solutions Companies - 2023
    ON THE DECK

    I agree We use cookies on this website to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies. More info

    Read Also

    Listening Beyond Hearing

    Listening Beyond Hearing

    Salvatore Incardona, Head of IT, Amplifon Australia
    Modernizing Lending Through Innovative, Secure and Scalable Technology

    Modernizing Lending Through Innovative, Secure and Scalable Technology

    Steven Meek, Chief Information Officer, Pepper Money
    Advancing the Chemical Industry through Digital Transformation

    Advancing the Chemical Industry through Digital Transformation

    Jan Mandrup Olesen, Global Head of Digital Business, Indorama Ventures
    Cultivating a Sustainable Future through Collaboration

    Cultivating a Sustainable Future through Collaboration

    Jiunn Shih, Chief Marketing, Innovation & Sustainability Officer, Zespri International
    Mastering Digital Marketing Strategies

    Mastering Digital Marketing Strategies

    Tasya Aulia, Director of Marketing and Communications, Meliá Hotels International
    Building a Strong Collaborative Framework for Artificial Intelligence

    Building a Strong Collaborative Framework for Artificial Intelligence

    Boon Siew Han, Regional Head of Humanoid Component Business & R&D (Apac & Greater China), Schaeffler
    From Legacy to Agility Through Digital Transformation

    From Legacy to Agility Through Digital Transformation

    Athikom Kanchanavibhu, EVP, Digital & Technology Transformation, Mitr Phol Group
    Change Management for Clinical Ancillary Teams: Aligning Practice with Policy and Progress

    Change Management for Clinical Ancillary Teams: Aligning Practice with Policy and Progress

    Ts. Dr. James Chong, Chief Executive Officer, Columbia Asia Hospital – Tebrau
    Loading...
    Copyright © 2025 APAC CIOOutlook. All rights reserved. Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy and Anti Spam Policy 

    Home |  CXO Insights |   Whitepapers |   Subscribe |   Conferences |   Sitemaps |   About us |   Advertise with us |   Editorial Policy |   Feedback Policy |  

    follow on linkedinfollow on twitter follow on rss
    This content is copyright protected

    However, if you would like to share the information in this article, you may use the link below:

    https://education.apacciooutlook.com/cxoinsights/are-we-at-peak-ed-tech-nwid-8439.html